quadruple aim for better administrative workflow

Quadruple aim for better administrative workflow series#

And, as much as we would like to blame the data warehouses and integrators of the data, the responsibility for this imbalance of access to data falls on the shoulders of the stakeholders deciding what and when data is integrated, analyzed and provided to clinicians. Ideally, data should improve their connections with patients, improve care quality, increase efficiency, and optimize episodes of care as promised through EHR policy mandates and technological advances.Ī relationship of asymmetry exists, however, between the access to data clinicians have and the information systems put in place to help them.

give you supporting research and guidance for the most logical places to impact and optimize processes to achieve better outcomes for clinicians and patients.Įpisode 2 (4 sessions): Data – start with the end in mind the clinician/patient relationshipĬlinicians struggle to access information meant to serve them.share success stories from peers and help guide you to recognize who in your organization is responsible for acknowledging and addressing the challenges.frame the current challenges and share best practices to address them.Who in the organization is responsible for acknowledging and addressing these challenges? And where is the most logical place to begin the research and solution process? This introductory session frames up these challenges and how best to address them. This asymmetry is obvious to most doctors, nurses and care professionals – the inability to access relevant information in the midst of workflow the lack of interoperability and access among systems and the lack of ongoing, contextual training that keeps many in healthcare from optimizing the use of available systems. A few super-user clinicians can brag about what they can do with their IT mastery, while most find the processes inefficient and unrewarding. But perhaps the most maddening aspects are the tremendous promise those systems have and the disappointing returns physicians have experienced. Healthcare professionals experience many frustrations when it comes to using digital systems in their day-to-day practice of medicine and coordinating care. In a 4-week virtual education series, HDM and KLAS Research bring together the most recent research with real world evidence from providers and their technology partners to share how innovation – people, process, and technology – can improve this situation, and truly enhance the clinician experience.Įpisode 1 (4 sessions): The asymmetries of the care team experience Yet, many feel betrayed and victimized by overpromised solutions as the time invested in using these systems has materially reduced clinicians' available face-to-face interaction time with patients. These caregivers have been promised a variety of benefits to entice them to use digital systems as part of the care delivery process. The caregiver is challenged daily with the imbalance of access to information and their lack of mastery of the technologies, which result in “note bloat,” too many hours spent documenting care, and burnout. In our quest for the Quadruple Aim, we often cite better outcomes, reduced costs, improved patient experience, and healthcare equity many times overlooking the support needed by clinicians on the front line of healthcare. Who should watch: content intended for ambulatory, acute and post-acute care facility leadership, clinicians, operations and technology teams, and other associates supporting patient care.Įnhancing Clinician & Care Team Experience - the Missing Aim

Quadruple aim for better administrative workflow series#

What you will see: a 4-episode learning series focused on people, process and technology strategies leading clinician experience improvement. This HDMKLASroom 4-episode series includes 18 on-demand learning sessions streamed in half-hour sessions